Return to Former Camp Robinson Property
|
|
RAB
members absent: Others Present: Chason Smith (COE-Huntsville), Dan Plugge, (COE-Huntsville), Gerald Moore (Parsons-Atlanta), Andrew Hands (Parsons-Austin), Anne Borg (Borg Association Management), David Virden (COE-Little Rock), The meeting was called to order at 6:45 P.M. by meeting facilitator Anne Borg. Ms. Borg asked RAB members to introduce themselves. A quorum was present. Mr. Gerry
Moore of Parsons Engineering Science from Atlanta presented a Power
Point presentation titled “Post EE/CA (Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis)
Public Review Meeting – Project Investigation Summary and Recommendations.”
The report summarized findings of the investigation at the approximately
15,000 acre portion of the former Camp Robinson site located in Pulaski
and Faulkner Counties just north of North Little Rock. Mr. Moore encouraged
questions during and after the presentation. Mr. Moore presented the
following key points and areas of information: The Camp Robinson Site was divided into 5 Areas for the purposes of study with Area 2 becoming the primary focus. Approximately 4,206 acres of Area 2 are in use by the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission for recreational functions such as hunting, fishing and wildlife habitat management. The other portion of Area 2 is owned by numerous private parties. Land use in this 9,260 acre sector is a mixture of residential, agricultural, forest and undeveloped property. Parson further divided Area 2 into 14 sectors. (Parsons maps displaying Areas and Sectors were shown in the presentation and also were in the handout given to those in attendance.) Using an UXO calculator, Parsons determined the test area “subset” or how much of the area to study for statistical accuracy. A 90% confidence level was desired. Parsons used information about ordnance found in the past to determine the focus areas. The team used highly sophisticated metal detectors to scan the selected study sites and found many objects that were evaluated. Most of the 2,322 anomalies that were uncovered were “ordnance scraps” or what was classified as “other scrap.” There were twelve UXO and two OE items found. The report outlined what each of the UXO and OE objects were and where they were found. Sectors 6, 10 and 11 were outlined in detail as to findings and the recommended response. In addition Parsons made four overall recommendations for response to these findings. 1. Public
education of OE safety. Teach the public about the risks and to “walk
away” if an item is found and call the appropriate response team. A copy of the Draft Final EE/CA is available at the Mayflower Public Library and at the Corps of Engineers Public Affairs Office. The public review period extended from May 2 until June 13, 2003. Mr. Moore indicated the report had a tremendous amount of data and he encouraged all members of the public or anyone with questions to call Mr. Max Frauenthal at 501-324-5197 or visit the project web site at www.projecthost.com and click on the Camp Robinson Project from the pull down menu. A Question & Answer session followed the presentation. |